For Your Information: Foreigners' Rights in Homogeneous Populations (SOCHUM Topic A)

Here's a second article on SOCHUM's Topic A: Foreigners' Rights in Homogeneous Populations

The rights of ‘gaijin’ - the derogatory Japanese word for ‘foreigner’, ‘outsider’ or ‘alien’ - has recently become a hotly debated issue in the country, which is one of the most homogeneous states in the world. For example, although roughly 98% of the population is ethnically Japanese, citizens who possess Korean ancestry are still discriminated against today; they are not allowed to ascend to or given management positions in the public sector. Prejudice against foreigners is a practice that is still very much entrenched in Japanese society, though efforts have been made as of late to change this.

There are reports of foreigners being regularly stopped by local police on the street despite having lived there for many years. Events such as 9/11 didn’t help either, causing the distrust towards foreigners to heighten; restaurants rejected foreign patrons, realtors often turned down foreign renters, and hospitals sometimes refused to treat foreign patients. ‘Japanese Only’ signs have not been totally eradicated, and can still be found in many establishments. Foreigners are also sometimes charged significantly higher prices than locals. Perhaps this deeply ingrained attitude has to do in part with Japanese citizenship law, which does not award citizenship based on location of birth but by bloodline, and also the racial discrimination of Imperial Japan, which started when the imperial government sought to colonize their neighbouring countries.

While we are on the subject of laws, it is worth noting that although Japan does have an article in the constitution (Article 14), which states that all persons are equal under the law, the country does not currently have any form of civil rights legislation that outlaws discrimination. The Bureau of Human Rights under the local Ministry of Justice handles discrimination cases; however, it is powerless when it comes to punitive action against discrimination as the Bureau can only issue out warnings. It would, for example, be unable to fine Nippon Airways for their recent caricature advertisement involving Japanese actors and actresses dressing up as blonde foreigners with big noses, not to mention those ‘Japan-for-Japanese’ vans which drive around with megaphones perpetuating anti-foreigner sentiment.

However, there are encouraging signs that the situation is improving.

Despite having no proper punitive discrimination law, Japanese courts, which have heard allegations of racial discrimination, have been fair and unbiased. A few years ago, a court delivered a ruling that forced a jewellery shop that refused service to a Brazilian by calling upon the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination. Just last month, another court cited the UN convention in a ruling that required anti-Korean protestors to pay damages for racial discrimination. The Japanese themselves have started to take this issue by the horns by organising rallies and counter-protests to stand up against racial discrimination.

These are certainly steps in the right direction. There are some who might argue that the next logical step would be the introduction of equitable legislation to protect foreigners’ rights. It may take a few years – or perhaps, a generation – even after such laws are implemented and enforced, but Japan is definitely on its way to a society that is free of discrimination.


By Michael James Anthony


Photo Courtesy of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Shibuya_night.jpg